April 2005

Fafnir gets the scoop

FafblogIt’s Interview Week on Fafblog, and today Fafnir interviews no less a celebrity than the Constitution. It is, as it always is on Fafblog, hilariously funny, and also, as it always is again, painfully revealing.

FAFBLOG: But so much has changed in the last two hundred years Constitution. Isn’t there stuff in the original Constitution that doesn’t apply to our crazy world a flyin cars an internet babies?

CONSTITUTION: There’s one thing the Founding Fathers couldn’t have anticipated, Fafnir - and that’s the threat of terrorism. The men who drafted me could never have guessed that the United States would be imperiled by a foreign threat! A foreign white threat, maybe… but a foreign brown threat? The mind reels!

FAFBLOG: It’s true - 9/11 changed everything, even math and Jesus.

CONSTITUTION: And that’s why I’ve had to change to make America stronger and safer over the last four years. Treason against the United States is no longer defined as “levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort,” but as “lookin’ funny.” The Fifth Amendment has been modified to “Fuck ‘em.” The Eighth Amendment has been modified to “Fuck ‘em harder.” And instead of “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States,” the president is now “Gilded Child of the Sun and Eater of the Stars Whose Every Whim is Law.”

Fafnir rules! (Giblets, pretend you didn’t hear that.)

observe the passing scene

Comments (0)

Permalink

We’re pretty proud of Alex

Alex BlumbergTransom.org bills itself as “A Showcase and Workshop for New Public Radio”. The focus is on the tools and techniques and discipline required to produce good radio—radio that’s creative, relevant, emotionally gripping, and clear. Alex and his students from the graduate class he’s teaching at Columbia are Transom guests for April and May, and will be talking about, and demonstrating, how to create a great radio story. They join some pretty distinguished company; former Transom guests include Sarah Chayes and Sarah Vowell, Studs Terkel, Errol Morris, Corey Flintoff, Lawrence Weschler, and Alex’s boss Ira Glass.

In his Manifesto, Alex talks about how to determine whether you’re onto something that has a chance to succeed as a story.

You can tell a lot about whether something’s a story entirely from the first question that occurs to you. And this is something that I try get my students to think about when considering a story idea. You’re the reporter, you get your recorder together, go to the site of your story, find someone to interview, and what do you ask? It may seem basic, but I find it very helpful to think about, even today. Literally, what’s the question that I want to answer, or the story I want to hear? If the questions seem obvious, chances are it’s a story.

Alex gives lots of examples. He also includes links to three stories that his students have produced as class assignments. The first assignment was to produce an audio profile; I was particularly moved by Nazanin Rafsanjani’s story of a woman trying to live on minimum wage. Partway in, the story drops suddenly into one of the most clear-eyed and un-self-pitying introspections I’ve heard. Gripping work. I’m looking forward to following the class over the next couple of months, to see how they develop under Alex’s tutelage.

love my family

Comments (0)

Permalink

Ratzinger’s Failure

Over at Body and Soul, Jeanne offers a brilliant meditation on Cardinal Ratzinger and Bishop Oscar Romero. Jeanne’s judgment of Ratzinger’s wartime service in the Hitler Youth and the German Army is sad, measured, generous, and courageous. It is, she allows, unfair and unproductive to call Ratzinger a “Nazi” or to accuse him of holding opinions in accord with Nazi positions on the Jews or on totalitarian rule. But when she holds the new pope to the same standards of moral courage demonstrate by Romero, she finds him tragically lacking.

Clearly, when Ratzinger and his brother (who is also a priest) say that anti-Nazi resistance was “impossible,” they’re lying. And it’s not an insignificant or harmless lie. Denying the option of resistance insults, indeed, denies the existence of, a lot of people who made far braver and more difficult decisions than the Ratzingers. Failing to exhibit extraordinary courage is human and understandable. Denying the extraordinarily courageous their due is shameful. Denying moral agency is surely unworthy of a man who would be pope.

This is an extraordinary post, worth reading in its entirety. I recommend that you follow the link and do so.

observe the passing scene

Comments (0)

Permalink

Cultural Censorship

In his current Journal, David Byrne discusses the completely arbitrary and unexplained denial of visas to a wide range of foreign artists and musicians. Because those denials can come at any time, many US promoters are simply not booking foreign groups, because any member of those groups is likely to be denied a visa, causing the cancellation of the tour. Byrne is tempted to see some purpose to these INS actions, and it’s not Homeland Security.

An ill-informed, isolated, ignorant populace is a populace easily manipulated. Fed a diet of reality shows coupled with faith-based reasoning (an oxymoron if ever there was one) and you have a perfect recipe for a country in which the government that can do more or less whatever it wants. Democracy becomes a farce without access to information. And culture — music, theater, dance, etc. — is information for the heart.

observe the passing scene

Comments (0)

Permalink

The Longshanks Sutta

This is what I’ve heard:

The Blessed OneOnce, when the Blessed One was staying among the Koliyans, near their market town, a man named Longshanks of the Tiger clan came to see him. He paid his respects, sat at the Buddha’s side, and spoke. “Lord, we are ordinary people, and we enjoy our pleasures. We’re family people, living with our wives and lots of kids running around. We decorate our homes with fine fabrics and fragrant sandalwood; we wear stylish clothes and expensive scents; we love gold and jewelry. Does the Blessed One have a dharma for folks like us, for our happiness and well-being now, and our continued happiness and well-being through whatever the future brings?”

The Blessed One answered:

“There are four qualities, Tiger, that lead to a family man’s happiness and well-being in this life. Which four? Getting good at his job; getting good at protecting his wealth; keeping good company; and balancing the books.

“And what does it mean to be good at one’s job? No matter how a family man makes his living—farming or retailing or ranching; being a soldier or a bureaucrat or a craftsman—when he gets clever at it, sticks with it, understands what needs to be done and masters the skills to do that, gets help when he needs it, and follows through to see that every task is completed successfully, then that’s called being good at the job.

“And what does it mean to be good at protecting one’s wealth? That’s when a family man has gained a measure of wealth, Tiger—gained it righteously, on his own initiative, by diligent effort, by using all his strength and sticking with it through the long haul, and then manages to hold it together, with the idea that nobody, neither tax collectors nor thieves, is going to steal it, that fire won’t destroy it nor floods wash it away, that undeserving heirs will never get their hands on it. That’s called getting good at protecting wealth.

“And what does it mean to keep good company? Here, Tiger, no matter where a family man lives, in city or village, he spends his time with people—parents and children, young or old—whose lives are good in every sense. Those are the people he talks with and shares ideas with. He learns to trust by following those who have gotten good at trusting; he becomes virtuous by following those who live virtuously; he learns to be generous by following those who act generously; he becomes wise by following those who have attained wisdom. All that is called keeping good company.

“And what does it mean to balance the books? If a family man measures his income against his expenses and leads his life in accord with those measurements, neither extravagantly nor in miserly fashion, he will know that his income will exceed his expenses and that his expenses will not exceed his income.

“Every goldsmith learns to hold a balance and to see precisely how far it dips, how far it rises; so a family man can put his income and expenses into the balance and know that he need be neither spendthrift nor miser, but live so that income does not fall below expenses, and expenses never outweigh income.

“Tiger, if a family man whose income is meager spends more than he has, people say he is like one who shakes the tree to get one apple; it won’t last long at that rate. If, on the other hand, one with a large income chooses to live like a beggar, people say, ‘His life will end in misery.’

“Keeping income and expenses under control, living a moderate life, neither spending more than you make nor keeping more than you need: that, Tiger, is called balancing the books.

“Now, there are four habits that will dissipate whatever wealth a family man may build: sexual adventuring, drinking and drugging, gambling, and hanging out with unworthy companions. If there is a large reservoir with four inlets and four outlets, and the person managing that reservoir opens all the outlets and closes the inlets, then the reservoir will surely drain, unless it rains forever. Just so, a person’s wealth will be surely drained as the direct result of sexual adventuring, drinking and drugging, gambling, and bad companions.

“There are four habits, again, that will lead to an increase in wealth. They are refraining from sexual adventuring, staying clean and sober, avoiding the gambling tables, and keeping good companions. Take that same reservoir. If the person managing it closes the outlets and opens the inlets, then the water level will rise with every rainfall, and it will not fall even in a drought. So one who does not betray his mate, who stays sober and clear-headed, who does not play games with chance, who keeps good company—that one will will surely increase his wealth.

“Now, Tiger, you’ve heard the four qualities that bring happiness and well-being to the family man’s life today.

“There are also four qualities that will insure happiness and well-being in the future, whatever that may bring.

“They are founding your life on faith, founding your life on virtuous behavior, founding your life on generosity, and founding your life on wisdom.

“How does a family man found his life on faith? With faith, Tiger, a family man accepts the enlightened perfection of the One Who’s Gone the Distance, the Tathagata. He knows this: the Blessed One is a pure spirit, fully enlightened, seeing the way and following it, getting it at every turn and getting it all, the only one able to tame those ready to be tamed, the teacher of gods and men, all-knowing, perfected. Knowing that, a family man builds the future on a foundation of faith.

“And how does a family man found his life on virtuous behavior? Quite simply, he does not kill, nor steal, nor abuse anyone sexually, nor speak to deceive or sow discord, nor use intoxicants that make him careless and stupid. Behaving in such a way, a family man builds the future on a foundation of virtue.

“And how does one found his life on generosity? Here, Tiger, a family man lives close to home, his mind unstained by greed, liberal in act and spirit, joyfully magnanimous, responsive to those in need, a happy alms-giver. Living thus, a family man builds the future on a foundation of generosity.

“And how does he found his life on wisdom? This is the case, Tiger, when the family man realizes this: everything that begins in time will end in time. That single truth penetrates appearances and leads to complete release from stress. Realizing this, a family man builds the future on a foundation of wisdom.”

Working smart, working hard, skills and vision trained,
Holding discourse with the good,
Spending no more than he should,
Protecting all the wealth he’s gained.

Dharma firm; virtue fixed; gladly giving, free of greed;
What rises, falls, he knows;
That planted, onward goes
To reap the certain harvest of such seed.

Eight steps, one path, for now and what comes next,
Proclaimed by one whose name
Is Thus Gone, wide in fame.
The family man finds peace, no more perplexed.

Notes
This is my attempt to render into contemporary English one of my favorite suttas from the Pali canon, known variously as the Vyagghapajja Sutta or the Dighajanu Sutta, for the two names by which the Buddha’s questioner is called in the text (see first note, below). I’ve written this version after exhaustive reading of three translations, all by people who know Pali (which I do not) and who have spent their lives practicing the discipline of the Blessed One (which I have not). Two of those are on the web, available at the generally excellent Access to Insight site:

There is also an excellent translation, a bit more abbreviated than those, and more contemporary in its style, in Bhikku Boddhi’s selection of suttas from the Anguttara Nikaya, Numerical Discourses of the Buddha (Chapter on the Eights).

I’m particularly fond of this sutta because, in it, the Buddha addresses a question that spiritual leaders seldom address - how can we find happiness in the life we’ve chosen in this world. And the answers he gives are entirely practical, and, in fact, reflect a shrewd understanding of the economics and operational realities of holding a job and heading a family.

a man named Longshanks of the Tiger clan

Dighajanu means, literally, “long-kneed” or “long-shinned”; according to the commentaries, this was the questioner’s familiar name, what we would call his first name; his family name, by which the Buddha addresses him throughout the discourse, is Vyagghapajja, which translates literally as “Tiger’s Paw” or “Tiger’s Path”; I’ve chosen to use the abbreviated term “Tiger”, because it sounds more colloquial to a contemporary American ear without abandoning entirely the sense of the Pali.

Getting good at

This phrase is my attempt to translate the Pali sampada; the translations listed above translate the term as “accomplishment” or “[becoming] consummate at”; I think “getting good at” sounds right and is immediately understandable to a contemporary reader. The Buddha uses the same phrase in the second part of the discourse, when he’s talking about the qualities that one must develop to win happiness in future lives; there I’ve rendered it as “founding your life on”, which seems a bit loftier and more appropriate to the context.

one who shakes the tree to get one apple

In the original, this is simply “wood-apple eater”; the commentaries give it the gloss that I’ve brought into the body of the text, i.e. one who shakes the tree to get one apple.

founding your life on

See note, above, on “getting good at”.

One Who’s Gone the Distance

The Buddha was known as the Tathagata, a name that has plagued translators for millenia. The literal meaning seems to be “thus-gone one”, and it probably refers to the fact that the Buddha has (1) gone further than any other seeker, and (2) discovered a path to truth that is his uniquely. I’ve chosen this phrase because it seems to indicate both of those senses, and it has, in addition, a suggestion of marvellousness to it that is appropriate to any talk of the Buddha. In the poem at the end, I’ve simply used the English “Thus Gone” as the name of the Buddha.

the Blessed One is a pure spirit, etc.

This is a formula, used in a lot of suttas, to declare one’s faith in the Buddha, his teaching, and the Sangha of initiates who carry that teaching through the world.

trust the Buddha

Comments (0)

Permalink

The countdown for the extinction of CDs

Mark Cuban, at Blog Maverick, wanted to buy a song to work out to and was frustrated. His analysis of the situation and his prediction regarding the marketplace’s solution to his problem is cogent. Here’s what he comes to:

For less than 10k dollars, it would be EASY to put together a multi-terrabyte hard drive based multi-user system that pretty much holds every song ever published. A screen to enter credit card information, swipe a debit card, enter a member number or call for assistance to handle a cash transaction, a couple USB ports, and wireless connection support to transfer the music, and you are in business.

Loss leaders like Walmart and Best Buy can cut their music square footage by 90 pct and sell more music at lower prices. Their inventory carrying costs will go to zero. If someone wants the CD, they can go home and burn it after docking their MP3 player to their PC. Believe or not, the labels will make more money this way because they will make these big boys committ to minimum guarantees at levels they are at now, and all that money after the artist cut, will go to the bottomline.

Everything about the economics makes absolutely perfect sense for the music labels, the retailer  and the customer. The only question is who will be the first label to crack and offer this and how soon will it be.

There’s still the RIAA to consider, of course. The fact that Cuban’s ideas make economic sense doesn’t mean that such sense will penetrate the narrow legalistic mindset of the current owners of Congress. And while it’s true that one very big label could start things moving, the only labels big enough to do that are the core members of the DRMA cadre; I can’t see any of them breaking rank. But I hope they do.

Link: The countdown for the extinction of CDs

observe the passing scene

Comments (0)

Permalink

Losing Weight

The TathagataThere’s a new post on Access To Insight, telling the story of King Prasenadi, who had a serious eating problem. Once, after he had eaten a whole bucket of food, he went, “engorged and panting”, to visit the Buddha, who was staying nearby. The Buddha, seeing the king’s condition, uttered this teaching:

When a person is constantly mindful,
And knows when enough food has been taken,
All their afflictions become more slender
— They age more gradually, protecting their lives.

The king, recognizing the truth of the Buddha’s words, requested his attendant to memorize them and repeat them to the king at the start of each meal.

The king eventually got to the point where he was eating only a cupful of rice each day; he slimmed down and gave great credit to the Buddha for showing him the way to a better life.

I sent the story to a friend from AA, who is also working a 12-step program for her over-eating (it’s working, and she is quite trim and lovely); she wrote back:

My  initial reaction is that it wouldn’t help a full blown food addict, any more than it would help an alcoholic or a dope head.  Depak Chopra teaches that an overweight person should learn to eat only when hungry.  I find that a very bad idea for a food addict, also.  Better to plan meals and very carefully avoid ever experiencing actual physical hunger.

I felt that she’d missed the point, and I told her so.

The Buddha was not presenting a program (or “Program”) to cure over-eating. He was presenting the view of eating that is consistent with his dharma. If you are working on the dharma, then this teaching relates that dharma to the act of eating, and demonstrates that a life lived in the dharma is a life in which recreational eating and general over-indulgence has no place. To one who is not working to comprehend and embody the dharma in her life, then the statement seems simple-minded at best, or even a little silly.

I was talking to a woman at the Brew House at lunch; she’s a painter, and working in the neighborhood. She used to hang out there, and we were remembering people from the old days. She mentioned that she’d stopped drinking 12 years ago, and I asked her how she’d done it. She said that she just decided to quit and did. I mentioned AA, and she said that she’d tried that many years ago; had stopped for 4 years in fact, but picked up again when she just got fed up with the rigidity of the program. This time around, without AA, she seems quite sane about what drinking did to her, and how much better it is to wake up clear-headed; she’s clearly not white-knuckling it, and I would bet on her continuing sobriety. The point of all that being simply that there are numerous ways of dealing with an addicted state, and no one best way. There is, to my mind, one clearly superior way of dealing with our human condition of duhkha (suffering/frustration/stress/dissatisfaction); dealing with addition is an essential component of realizing that dharma, and realizing the dharma makes any method of dealing with addiction more likely to work.

I was happy to find the story of King Prasenadi. It was just posted on the Access To Insight site yesterday. I intend to commit the Buddha’s word’s to memory and recollect them at the beginning of each meal. We’ll see how it works. Indeed we will.

So, the point of all this is that I am now on a Buddha-inspired path to lose weight. Here is how I have re-worked the teaching to fit me:

If I remain constantly mindful,
Knowing what I’ve eaten and when I’ve had enough,
My body and my troubles will lose their burdensome weight;
I will age more gracefully, with fewer ills.

I repeat that whenever I sit down to eat, or when I feel the urge to eat between meals. I hope that it works for me as well as it did for King Prasenadi. I will let you know.

trust the Buddha

Comments (0)

Permalink

Punctuation

Out there relentless
Time drives all becoming,
Hastening.

Meanwhile we here
And now hold our selves to be,
Still.

write poems

Comments (0)

Permalink