January 2006

Defender of the faith

Dr. Wesley Elsberry

DarkSyde has a long, excellent interview with Wesley Elsberry, Information Director for the National Center for Science Education, a leading defender of the teaching of evolution in the public schools, and a major player in the Dover case. Elsberry is a professed Christian, and it’s clear from the interview that he gets particularly ticked off at the IDiots for their persistent attempts to hijack Christianity (and all religous faith) for their own reactionary ends.

Wesley Elsberry: I’m a Christian believer, a member of the United Methodist church. I think that the assertion that one must give up belief if one accepts the findings of evolutionary biology is a misguided attack on the faith that I and many others hold. Certainly the "intelligent design" advocates have advanced this notion, saying that "intelligent design" is no friend of theistic evolution. If one looks at the transcripts of the 2005 Kansas board of education hearings with their antievolution advocates, one will see this reflected in particularly virulent form.

There you can see various "experts" opining that people like me simply have not given this matter due consideration. This is what "separation of church and state" is all about, though. The First Amendment means that they don’t have the legal authority to put their particular theology, which is hostile to mine and millions of other Christians, into the public school classrooms. If they want to preach a sermon on how awful they find the faith of myself and others like me, they have to do it on their own dime and without appropriating the authority of school teachers to do it.

The NCSE is fighting the good fight. It only costs $30 to join them; I’ve signed up, and I hope that many others will do so as a result of the exposure that the Daily Kos is giving them.

clip
respect rationality

Comments (0)

Permalink

Breaking news from the Catholic Churchâ„¢

This one is purely funny.

For the first time all papal documents, including encyclicals, will be governed by copyright invested in the official Vatican publishing house, the Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

The edict covers Pope Benedict XVI’s first encyclical, which is to be issued this week amid huge international interest. The edict is retroactive, covering not only the writings of the present pontiff — as Pope and as cardinal — but also those of his predecessors over the past 50 years. It therefore includes anything written by John Paul II, John Paul I, Paul VI and John XXIII.

A Milanese publishing house that had issued an anthology containing 30 lines from Pope Benedict’s speech to the conclave that elected him and an extract from his enthronement speech is reported to have been sent a bill for €15,000 (£10,000). This was made up of 15 per cent of the cover price of each copy sold plus “legal expenses� of €3,500.

They’ve got a pretty good batch of lobbyists. Maybe they could funnel some of the royalty payments they collect to buying a few Republicans, and get them to stretch copyright protection, retroactively, to a couple of millenia. Then they could really rake it in.

clip
observe the passing scene

Comments (0)

Permalink

Axis of Evil

They are vehemently against abortion, they resist progressive woman’s rights. They view homosexuality as a crime against nature and God, some advocate the death penalty as an option for it. Separation of Church and State is despised by these folks; they insist the nation is founded on the principles of their religion, and they work hard to bring that de facto theocracy about. They deplore strong language, gay characters, and sexual content on TV and in the media. And they ignore the Geneva Convention when it suits their ideological purposes, including provisions against torture or due process. They’re anti-stem cell research, pro-creationism, and generally distrustful of science. These folks are easily whipped into a state of frenzy with ideological manipulation to the point where they will commit violence, or at least tacitly endorse that violence is acceptable, if it advances their Divine agenda. They then take great pains to justify that violence, including unprovoked attack of civilian areas, under certain conditions, with convoluted theological gymnastics. They are almost to the man pro-death penalty

Osama bin BushDarkSyde is, of course, talking about Osama bin Laden and the fundamentalist Wahabism that Osama subscribes to, along with hundreds of millions of others, more and more each day. In a typically well-written article, he calls bullshit on Fox News and others who compare bin Laden to Michael Moore and other gadflies of the left, and he tells it like it is: “It’s the Neocon, fundie dominated, GOP that is the closest thing to fanatical Wahhabism in our nation today and there’s no major political faction anywhere near giving them a run for the money.”

clip
reject the one true God

Comments (0)

Permalink

The End of the World is Near

James LovelockWikipedia may be making us smarter, but it’s not going to happen fast enough to save the planet, according to James Lovelock, the man who developed the concept of earth as Gaia—the planet as an organism, with its own homeostatic mechanisms and its own processes for protecting itself from disaster. Mankind has over-whelmed those processes and mechanisms, according to Lovelock, and it’s too late to do anything about it.

The world has already passed the point of no return for climate change, and civilisation as we know it is now unlikely to survive, according to James Lovelock, the scientist and green guru who conceived the idea of Gaia - the Earth which keeps itself fit for life.

In a profoundly pessimistic new assessment, published in today’s Independent, Professor Lovelock suggests that efforts to counter global warming cannot succeed, and that, in effect, it is already too late.

The world and human society face disaster to a worse extent, and on a faster timescale, than almost anybody realises, he believes. He writes: " Before this century is over, billions of us will die, and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable."

Lovelock’s new book, to be published in February, is titled “The Revenge of Gaia”. The only people whom it’s likely to make happy are the fundamentalist end-time crazies. Lovelock, in the Independent interview, describes as “a wake-up call”. But it seems to me that we’ll be waking up to a much worse nightmare than the one we were dreaming. It will be interesting, if disheartening, to see how our government’s respond to the message that Lovelock delivers.

clip
dread the rising dark

Comments (0)

Permalink

Happy Wikipedia Day!

WikipediaWikipedia turns five years old today. It’s difficult for me to think of a website that’s done more to change the way I learn than Wikipedia. I’ve been reading E.P. Thompson’s “The Making of the English Working Class”; it’s fascinating, persuasive, and well-written, but filled with allusions to people, movements and events in English history that I don’t know: Socinianism, the Gordon Riots, Tyburn Fair, et.al. Wikipedia has been very helpful with about 90% of those references. The following clip, which is the entire text of Wikipedia’s own article on Wikipedia Day, is typical of what I find there; authoritative, non-defensive, brief and clearly written, replete with links to other articles and outside resources that might help me find what I’m looking for, or that illuminate what I’ve found. (Click on the Source link above to go to the article; then the links in it will be live.)

The English Wikipedia alone now has more than 920,000 articles, with over 340,000,000 words. The millionth article is expected to appear in late February or early March. The combined Wikipedias for all languages have an estimated total of over 3,100,000 articles in some two hundred languages. Eighty-four of the non-English Wikipedias have over 1,000 articles, thirty-six have over 10,000 and seven have over 100,000.

For a few days now, Wikipedia has been listed on Alexa as the 20th most popular website in the world (one week average). The current trend should see it entering the top ten this year.

129 new servers were purchased during 2005, bringing the total to 171.[1] The Wikimedia cluster has had to be moved to another facility (also in Tampa, Florida) to obtain more space. Wikimedia now has three auxiliary server clusters, in Paris, Amsterdam and Seoul.

Though Wikipedians are celebrating, the future of Wikipedia has come into question over the last year with numerous negative stories in the media, and internal political strife. News focused on studies which found Wikipedia to have a slightly lower article accuracy than Britannica and incidents of patently false articles which have drawn international attention and criticism. In 2005 many new tools had to be introduced to deal with the growing incidents of vandalism, but have had little effect other than to keep the rate of vandalism steady. The vandalism coupled with questions about whether or not Wikipedia can ever serve as a trustworthy reference source means that 2006 will likely be a challenging and important year for the Project.

Wikipedia has been steadily increasing the number of articles it serves, with a doubling rate somewhat less than a year. (Here’s an archived snapshot of Wikipedia as it existed a little more than a month after its public debut, with over 1,000 articles, aiming at 100,000.) More importantly, the service has developed, in a communal, orderly, and democratic manner, mechanisms for insuring the accuracy of the information it presents and preventing vandals and fanatics of various stripes from interfering with its mission. Short of spending eight hours in the library, I know of no better way to get an authoritative overview of even complex and extensive subjects.

If you find Wikipedia as useful as I do, you might want to contribute something, as I have, to help them keep the service operating effectively. And even if you don’t want to contribute, at least join me in wishing Jimmy Wales and his many thousand colleagues and collaborators a very Happy Birthday!

browse the web
clip

Comments (0)

Permalink

Frauds and Victims of Frauds

James Frey mug shotUnless you’ve been living in a hole somewhere, you’ve probably caught wind of the fact that a very fine blog, The Smoking Gun, has published a devastatingly detailed exposé of the lies that fill James Frey’s bestselling book “A Million Little Pieces”. The Smoking Gun’s investigation, titled “A Million Little Lies”, is a fascinating read. But the most amazing thing about the affair is that Doubleday, the book’s publisher, is essentially dismissing the exposure as no big deal. Memoirs are like that, they seem to be claiming; a memoirist can take a few liberties. All that matters is that the book is a gripping read with a powerful emotional message. But Frey has taken more than a few liberties. He has apparently lied about everything of substance in the book (I have not read it). And now Seth Mnookin has done an excellent job of explaining why the lies matter. It is a big deal after all.

Unfortunately, because A Million Little Pieces—one of the best-selling books about drug addiction ever written—has been trumpeted as an unflinching, real-life look into the world of a drug addict, it has helped to shape people’s notions about drug abuse. Ironically, the very abundance of its clichés has likely helped make it a runaway best seller: People, after all, like having their suspicions confirmed. For nonaddicts, Pieces reinforces the still dangerously prevalent notion that it’s easy to spot a drug addict or an alcoholic—they’re the ones bleeding from holes in their cheeks or getting beaten down by the police or doing hard time with killers and rapists. For those struggling with their own substance-abuse issues, Pieces sends the message that unless you’ve reached the depths Frey describes, you don’t have anything to worry about—you’re a Fraud. And if you do have a problem, you don’t need to necessarily get treatment or look to others for support; all you need to do is "hold on." In building up a false bogeyman—the American recovery movement’s supposed reliance on the notion of "victimhood"—Frey has set himself up as the one, truth-telling savior. In fact, it seems clear that Frey would have been well-served by taking the kind of unflinchingly honest look at his own life that most recovery programs demand.

clip

Comments (0)

Permalink

Word-worthy Pictures

Chris Ware's comic art

Tim Marchman, in the “New York Post”, has an excellent review of Chris Ware’s comic work. Tim discusses the various things that word novelists can do and those that graphic novelists can do; it’s not that the graphic novel is the better device, but that Chris Ware is a very very fine graphic novelist, better at what he does than most of his contemporaries who are word novelists are at what they do.

Lamenting the absence of qualities in contemporary novelists basically amounts to lamenting the lack of ideas, and, more importantly, the lack of ideas expressed as emotions. These are just what you find in Chris Ware’s Acme Library of Novelty, an anthology of comic strips that was the best fiction of the season. His ideas are all about the way technology is alienating us not only from our own potential but from our ability to imagine it—the major subject of our time. While the emotional range of his work is in some ways limited, mainly playing variations on a few themes of aching emptiness, regret, shame, cruelty and remorse, that’s fitting given his themes and the contours of his medium. (It also exceeds the range of most novelists working in prose, who display little beyond a smug, preening vanity.)

Here’s a link to Fantagraphics Chris Ware page. And if you haven’t read Ware’s great comic novel from several years ago, “Jimmy Corrigan: The Smartest Kid on Earth”, read it now.

Thanks to Boing Boing for the link.

clip
read

Comments (0)

Permalink

Hacking Starbucks

Tim Harford, at Slate, tells you why you want a short cappuccino, why Starbucks would prefer that you order something else, and why they’ll give you what you want without demur, if you just ask for it.

The drink in question is the elusive "short cappuccino"—at 8 ounces, a third smaller than the smallest size on the official menu, the "tall," and dwarfed by what Starbucks calls the "customer-preferred" size, the "Venti," which weighs in at 20 ounces and more than 200 calories before you add the sugar.

The short cappuccino has the same amount of espresso as the 12-ounce tall, meaning a bolder coffee taste, and also a better one. The World Barista Championship rules, for example, define a traditional cappuccino as a "five- to six-ounce beverage." This is also the size of cappuccino served by many continental cafés. Within reason, the shorter the cappuccino, the better.

I know what I’m ordering tomorrow morning.

clip

Comments (0)

Permalink

God 1, Sharon 0

Morbidly obese SharonGod picks easy targets. First, New Orleans—a city built below sea level and protected by poorly designed and badly maintained levees. Now, Ariel Sharon—morbidly obese, hypertensive, over-stressed. God got him with what Josh Marshall called “punitive cardiology”. Here’s Pat:

"He was dividing God’s land, and I would say, ‘Woe unto any prime minister of Israel who takes a similar course to appease the [European Union], the United Nations or the United States of America,’" Robertson told viewers of his long-running television show, "The 700 Club."

"God says, ‘This land belongs to me, and you’d better leave it alone,’" he said.

I don’t believe that God smote Sharon, as much as he might have deserved smiting. As far as I can tell, the only thing that God does to people is make them arrogant and stupid. But He seems to do that to just about everyone He touches.

clip
observe the passing scene
reject the one true God

Comments (3)

Permalink

Peas, Prosperity, and Propaganda

Shell GameJoshua Holland has an excellent article explaining the disconnect between the numbers that BuschCo is flaunting, showing a vibrant and healthy economy, and the gloomy prospects that most ordinary Americans face. The neocons try to spin the story that we are being misled to pessimism by the “liberal media”; Holland’s article puts the brakes on that spin and documents lots of real reasons for gloom.

Consider these numbers from the Economic Policy Institute — a left-leaning think-tank (this essay leans heavily on EPI’s excellent research):

  • Salaries are still below where they were at the start of the recovery in November 2001. That, while productivity — the growth of the economic pie — is up by almost 15 percent. Meaning we’re working harder, producing more, for the same money as five years ago.
  • Since the recession ended in 2001, 50 percent more of the growth in corporate income was sucked up as profits than after past recessions. That’s left less for those of us who work for a living.
  • As a result, median household income has now fallen for five years in a row. It was 4 percent, or $2,000, lower in 2004 than it was in 1999.

That last figure means that Joe and Jane Average American — the household smack in the middle of the booming go-go American economy — have gotten a pay cut for five years in a row. Small wonder they’re sporting long faces.

When we were first married, 45 years ago, we felt rich. I was a first year public school teacher, and Joan was a Welfare Department case worker, and we were rich. We were able to afford a decent apartment and a car, and we had lots of free time to spend hanging out with friends and discussing events. Today, the only people we know with any free time at all are dropouts, a few lucky retirees whose pensions have not yet been stolen from them, and people living on trust fund money. Every working stiff we know is working harder than we did then, doing less involving work, working longer hours, and going deeper into debt to pay for the essentials of middle class life—health care, home, and education for the kids. None of them, even the ones earning comfortable six-figure incomes, feel as rich as we felt back then.

It’s a classic shell game. We see the pea; we watch the shell come down to cover it; we keep our eye on what we’re sure is the shell with the pea. And at the end, we’re wrong, and they have our money. Crooks and con artists: that’s all they are.

clip

Comments (0)

Permalink