One or the other

His Holiness, the 14th Dalai LamaThe New York Times reports on a talk that the Dalai Lama gave to more than 35,000 people in Rutgers Stadium, where he received an honorary degree. Two of the Tibetan monks sitting in the stadium bleachers remembered the first time that he spoke to an audience in the New York region, more than 25 years ago. Just a few hundred heard him then.

More are hearing him today, and the message he delivers is one that we need to hear.

As the Dalai Lama neared the end of his speech, he explored the difference between attachment and compassion – attachment being a selective connection shared by friends, he said, while compassion is an “unbiased” act. The two Tibetan monks, Mr. Gyantso and Japal Dorjee, 97, sat hunched and listening, their eyes closed. Nearby, a former flight attendant, Kathleen Davis, squealed. She had been taking notes on a pink piece of paper and pointed to the words “attachment” and “compassion.”

“That’s it!” she said. “It’s one or the other. I’ve got the goose bumps.”

Tibetan monks at a talk by the Dalai Lama

The “zen” explosion of the ’60′s and ’70′s was inspired by D.T. Suzuki’s presentation of zen as a discipline which could whack a seeker over the head with sudden insight—a direct route to experience unmediated by training, culture, intellect. Suzuki himself gets pretty fuzzy-minded, and his followers more so; their proselytizing led to what Chris Locke calls “the sanctimonious narcissism of the New Age”. Whatever the roots of zen might have been, by the time it reached the tennis court and the board room, and came to inform the art of motorcyle maintenance, the Buddha had pretty much disappeared from the scene.

This time around, the Buddhism is more traditional, rooted in the Buddha’s own teaching of the Dharma. That’s not mystical—not even “spiritual”, whatever that over-burdened term might mean. It’s practical stuff, leading us to an understanding of how our actions have consequences, and how we might train our minds so that our actions generate good consequences. It’s not fuzzy minded at all, but simple and real. Attachment on the one hand. Compassion on the the other. We get to choose. We have to choose.

It gives you goose bumps.

(Thanks to David Weinberger for the link to Chris Locke’s blog.)

Skillful Conversation

The TathagataThe story is told of the Buddha that once, while the community of monks were gathered in the meeting hall in Jeta’s Grove, in the town of Savatthi, waiting for the Lord to emerge from his morning meditation, they idled the time away talking about a wide range of topics: “conversation about kings, robbers, & ministers of state; armies, alarms, & battles; food & drink; clothing, furniture, garlands, & scents; relatives; vehicles; villages, towns, cities, the countryside; women & heroes; the gossip of the street & the well; tales of the dead; tales of diversity, the creation of the world & of the sea; talk of whether things exist or not.”

When the Buddha emerged and asked them what they had been talking about, they told him. He gently pointed out that such topics of conversation were not skillful, not appropriate to the path they’d chosen when they went forth from home to the homeless life. And he gave them, as was his habit, a list of ten topics that were more appropriate to those on the path to understanding: “Talk on modesty, on contentment, on seclusion, on non-entanglement, on arousing persistence, on virtue, on concentration, on discernment, on release, and on the knowledge & vision of release. These are the ten topics of conversation. If you were to engage repeatedly in these ten topics of conversation, you would outshine even the sun & moon, so mighty, so powerful….”

It’s easy, in the sangha that is the blogosphere, to find ourselves caught up in the kinds of conversations that the monks were having, and to give the sorts of topics they were discussing much more importance and much more substance than they have, and to neglect the topics that are really important: how to be good, how to be content, how to bring an end to suffering.

As I’ve gotten caught up in those conversations, I’ve put aside a lot of what I want to say, what I started this blog to say. And the longer it stays put aside, the more coherence it loses, and the more difficult it becomes to say it well. So I am going to heed the Buddha’s words, at least for the time being (which is the only time we really have), and I am withdrawing from the blogger’s game of spinning the latest revelation about “kings, robbers, & ministers of state; armies, alarms, & battles;… the creation of the world & of the sea; talk of whether things exist or not.” Posts will be less frequent, but they will be longer and less dependent upon what others are blogging about.

So. Visit Kos, Jeanne, Josh Marshall, the Whiskey Bar, PZ Myers, and the mostly smart folks at Arianna’s conversation pit. They’ll keep you informed and your juices flowing, much better than I. I’ll try to get my thoughts together and report back soon.

Buddhism and Christianity

The following post is in response to a request that Bill, over at Faith Commons, made for a “quick list of parallels between Buddhism and Christianity.” It is cross-posted, in a somewhat different form, to the Faith Commons site.

Unfortunately, Bill, there’s nothing quick about Buddhism. And, while there are certainly some parallels between the teachings of Jesus and those of Siddhartha Gautama*, the Buddha, there are very few similarities between Buddhism and Christianity. I’m going to take a stab at giving you an overview, of the similarities and of the differences (always with the understanding that this is as I see it, and I would hesitate to call myself a Buddhist; rather, I am one who finds the teachings of the Buddha more complete and truer than those of any other sage I know.)

There are three things, I think, that most clearly distinguish the Buddhist teachings from the Christian scriptures: the authenticity and coherence of the scriptural documents, the differing natures of Jesus and the Buddha, and the vast differences in the core doctrines. I’ll take these one at a time.
Continue reading

First, the footnote…

Kamma and rebirth

Cakka, the Wheel of the DammaOver at Faith Commons, last week, I made a flippant comment in response to a post by Bill questioning the relationship between the organized Church and the teachings of Jesus, and he challenged my flippancy with a serious request for “a quick list of parallels” between the teachings of Jesus and the teachings of the Buddha. I’ve been working on a response to that challenge, which I will post here and there very shortly. But in the course of writing that, what began as a footnote glossing the Buddhist concept of rebirth has turned into something way too long for a footnote, so I’ve made it into a post of its own, and here it goes.

This one is the sticking point for a lot of people. They may find Buddhism appealing for its rationality, its common sense. But then they come to the concept of rebirth and they balk. I did. It took me a lot of study, and a lot of thinking, to come to terms with an idea that I found so improbable, so difficult to reconcile with a doctrine that was in other regards so clear and persuasive. I came to realize that my problem with the Buddhist notion of rebirth was based, as so many of my problems are, on unexamined preconceptions derived from the popular culture in which I’ve grown up. When I heard the term “rebirth”, what filled my mind was more Shirley MacLaine than the Buddha; I associated the concept with all sorts of New Age nonsense, with Doonesbury’s Boopsie channeling Hunk Ra, with Mehitabel’s insistence that she is a reincarnation of Cleopatra. And that, of course, is not what it’s about, at all.
Continue reading

The Longshanks Sutta

This is what I’ve heard:

The Blessed OneOnce, when the Blessed One was staying among the Koliyans, near their market town, a man named Longshanks of the Tiger clan came to see him. He paid his respects, sat at the Buddha’s side, and spoke. “Lord, we are ordinary people, and we enjoy our pleasures. We’re family people, living with our wives and lots of kids running around. We decorate our homes with fine fabrics and fragrant sandalwood; we wear stylish clothes and expensive scents; we love gold and jewelry. Does the Blessed One have a dharma for folks like us, for our happiness and well-being now, and our continued happiness and well-being through whatever the future brings?”

The Blessed One answered:

“There are four qualities, Tiger, that lead to a family man’s happiness and well-being in this life. Which four? Getting good at his job; getting good at protecting his wealth; keeping good company; and balancing the books.

“And what does it mean to be good at one’s job? No matter how a family man makes his living—farming or retailing or ranching; being a soldier or a bureaucrat or a craftsman—when he gets clever at it, sticks with it, understands what needs to be done and masters the skills to do that, gets help when he needs it, and follows through to see that every task is completed successfully, then that’s called being good at the job.

“And what does it mean to be good at protecting one’s wealth? That’s when a family man has gained a measure of wealth, Tiger—gained it righteously, on his own initiative, by diligent effort, by using all his strength and sticking with it through the long haul, and then manages to hold it together, with the idea that nobody, neither tax collectors nor thieves, is going to steal it, that fire won’t destroy it nor floods wash it away, that undeserving heirs will never get their hands on it. That’s called getting good at protecting wealth.

“And what does it mean to keep good company? Here, Tiger, no matter where a family man lives, in city or village, he spends his time with people—parents and children, young or old—whose lives are good in every sense. Those are the people he talks with and shares ideas with. He learns to trust by following those who have gotten good at trusting; he becomes virtuous by following those who live virtuously; he learns to be generous by following those who act generously; he becomes wise by following those who have attained wisdom. All that is called keeping good company.

“And what does it mean to balance the books? If a family man measures his income against his expenses and leads his life in accord with those measurements, neither extravagantly nor in miserly fashion, he will know that his income will exceed his expenses and that his expenses will not exceed his income.

“Every goldsmith learns to hold a balance and to see precisely how far it dips, how far it rises; so a family man can put his income and expenses into the balance and know that he need be neither spendthrift nor miser, but live so that income does not fall below expenses, and expenses never outweigh income.

“Tiger, if a family man whose income is meager spends more than he has, people say he is like one who shakes the tree to get one apple; it won’t last long at that rate. If, on the other hand, one with a large income chooses to live like a beggar, people say, ‘His life will end in misery.’

“Keeping income and expenses under control, living a moderate life, neither spending more than you make nor keeping more than you need: that, Tiger, is called balancing the books.

“Now, there are four habits that will dissipate whatever wealth a family man may build: sexual adventuring, drinking and drugging, gambling, and hanging out with unworthy companions. If there is a large reservoir with four inlets and four outlets, and the person managing that reservoir opens all the outlets and closes the inlets, then the reservoir will surely drain, unless it rains forever. Just so, a person’s wealth will be surely drained as the direct result of sexual adventuring, drinking and drugging, gambling, and bad companions.

“There are four habits, again, that will lead to an increase in wealth. They are refraining from sexual adventuring, staying clean and sober, avoiding the gambling tables, and keeping good companions. Take that same reservoir. If the person managing it closes the outlets and opens the inlets, then the water level will rise with every rainfall, and it will not fall even in a drought. So one who does not betray his mate, who stays sober and clear-headed, who does not play games with chance, who keeps good company—that one will will surely increase his wealth.

“Now, Tiger, you’ve heard the four qualities that bring happiness and well-being to the family man’s life today.

“There are also four qualities that will insure happiness and well-being in the future, whatever that may bring.

“They are founding your life on faith, founding your life on virtuous behavior, founding your life on generosity, and founding your life on wisdom.

“How does a family man found his life on faith? With faith, Tiger, a family man accepts the enlightened perfection of the One Who’s Gone the Distance, the Tathagata. He knows this: the Blessed One is a pure spirit, fully enlightened, seeing the way and following it, getting it at every turn and getting it all, the only one able to tame those ready to be tamed, the teacher of gods and men, all-knowing, perfected. Knowing that, a family man builds the future on a foundation of faith.

“And how does a family man found his life on virtuous behavior? Quite simply, he does not kill, nor steal, nor abuse anyone sexually, nor speak to deceive or sow discord, nor use intoxicants that make him careless and stupid. Behaving in such a way, a family man builds the future on a foundation of virtue.

“And how does one found his life on generosity? Here, Tiger, a family man lives close to home, his mind unstained by greed, liberal in act and spirit, joyfully magnanimous, responsive to those in need, a happy alms-giver. Living thus, a family man builds the future on a foundation of generosity.

“And how does he found his life on wisdom? This is the case, Tiger, when the family man realizes this: everything that begins in time will end in time. That single truth penetrates appearances and leads to complete release from stress. Realizing this, a family man builds the future on a foundation of wisdom.”

Working smart, working hard, skills and vision trained,
Holding discourse with the good,
Spending no more than he should,
Protecting all the wealth he’s gained.

Dharma firm; virtue fixed; gladly giving, free of greed;
What rises, falls, he knows;
That planted, onward goes
To reap the certain harvest of such seed.

Eight steps, one path, for now and what comes next,
Proclaimed by one whose name
Is Thus Gone, wide in fame.
The family man finds peace, no more perplexed.

Notes
This is my attempt to render into contemporary English one of my favorite suttas from the Pali canon, known variously as the Vyagghapajja Sutta or the Dighajanu Sutta, for the two names by which the Buddha’s questioner is called in the text (see first note, below). I’ve written this version after exhaustive reading of three translations, all by people who know Pali (which I do not) and who have spent their lives practicing the discipline of the Blessed One (which I have not). Two of those are on the web, available at the generally excellent Access to Insight site:

There is also an excellent translation, a bit more abbreviated than those, and more contemporary in its style, in Bhikku Boddhi’s selection of suttas from the Anguttara Nikaya, Numerical Discourses of the Buddha (Chapter on the Eights).

I’m particularly fond of this sutta because, in it, the Buddha addresses a question that spiritual leaders seldom address – how can we find happiness in the life we’ve chosen in this world. And the answers he gives are entirely practical, and, in fact, reflect a shrewd understanding of the economics and operational realities of holding a job and heading a family.

a man named Longshanks of the Tiger clan

Dighajanu means, literally, “long-kneed” or “long-shinned”; according to the commentaries, this was the questioner’s familiar name, what we would call his first name; his family name, by which the Buddha addresses him throughout the discourse, is Vyagghapajja, which translates literally as “Tiger’s Paw” or “Tiger’s Path”; I’ve chosen to use the abbreviated term “Tiger”, because it sounds more colloquial to a contemporary American ear without abandoning entirely the sense of the Pali.

Getting good at

This phrase is my attempt to translate the Pali sampada; the translations listed above translate the term as “accomplishment” or “[becoming] consummate at”; I think “getting good at” sounds right and is immediately understandable to a contemporary reader. The Buddha uses the same phrase in the second part of the discourse, when he’s talking about the qualities that one must develop to win happiness in future lives; there I’ve rendered it as “founding your life on”, which seems a bit loftier and more appropriate to the context.

one who shakes the tree to get one apple

In the original, this is simply “wood-apple eater”; the commentaries give it the gloss that I’ve brought into the body of the text, i.e. one who shakes the tree to get one apple.

founding your life on

See note, above, on “getting good at”.

One Who’s Gone the Distance

The Buddha was known as the Tathagata, a name that has plagued translators for millenia. The literal meaning seems to be “thus-gone one”, and it probably refers to the fact that the Buddha has (1) gone further than any other seeker, and (2) discovered a path to truth that is his uniquely. I’ve chosen this phrase because it seems to indicate both of those senses, and it has, in addition, a suggestion of marvellousness to it that is appropriate to any talk of the Buddha. In the poem at the end, I’ve simply used the English “Thus Gone” as the name of the Buddha.

the Blessed One is a pure spirit, etc.

This is a formula, used in a lot of suttas, to declare one’s faith in the Buddha, his teaching, and the Sangha of initiates who carry that teaching through the world.

Losing Weight

The TathagataThere’s a new post on Access To Insight, telling the story of King Prasenadi, who had a serious eating problem. Once, after he had eaten a whole bucket of food, he went, “engorged and panting”, to visit the Buddha, who was staying nearby. The Buddha, seeing the king’s condition, uttered this teaching:

When a person is constantly mindful,
And knows when enough food has been taken,
All their afflictions become more slender
— They age more gradually, protecting their lives.

The king, recognizing the truth of the Buddha’s words, requested his attendant to memorize them and repeat them to the king at the start of each meal.

The king eventually got to the point where he was eating only a cupful of rice each day; he slimmed down and gave great credit to the Buddha for showing him the way to a better life.

I sent the story to a friend from AA, who is also working a 12-step program for her over-eating (it’s working, and she is quite trim and lovely); she wrote back:

My  initial reaction is that it wouldn’t help a full blown food addict, any more than it would help an alcoholic or a dope head.  Depak Chopra teaches that an overweight person should learn to eat only when hungry.  I find that a very bad idea for a food addict, also.  Better to plan meals and very carefully avoid ever experiencing actual physical hunger.

I felt that she’d missed the point, and I told her so.

The Buddha was not presenting a program (or “Program”) to cure over-eating. He was presenting the view of eating that is consistent with his dharma. If you are working on the dharma, then this teaching relates that dharma to the act of eating, and demonstrates that a life lived in the dharma is a life in which recreational eating and general over-indulgence has no place. To one who is not working to comprehend and embody the dharma in her life, then the statement seems simple-minded at best, or even a little silly.

I was talking to a woman at the Brew House at lunch; she’s a painter, and working in the neighborhood. She used to hang out there, and we were remembering people from the old days. She mentioned that she’d stopped drinking 12 years ago, and I asked her how she’d done it. She said that she just decided to quit and did. I mentioned AA, and she said that she’d tried that many years ago; had stopped for 4 years in fact, but picked up again when she just got fed up with the rigidity of the program. This time around, without AA, she seems quite sane about what drinking did to her, and how much better it is to wake up clear-headed; she’s clearly not white-knuckling it, and I would bet on her continuing sobriety. The point of all that being simply that there are numerous ways of dealing with an addicted state, and no one best way. There is, to my mind, one clearly superior way of dealing with our human condition of duhkha (suffering/frustration/stress/dissatisfaction); dealing with addition is an essential component of realizing that dharma, and realizing the dharma makes any method of dealing with addiction more likely to work.

I was happy to find the story of King Prasenadi. It was just posted on the Access To Insight site yesterday. I intend to commit the Buddha’s word’s to memory and recollect them at the beginning of each meal. We’ll see how it works. Indeed we will.

So, the point of all this is that I am now on a Buddha-inspired path to lose weight. Here is how I have re-worked the teaching to fit me:

If I remain constantly mindful,
Knowing what I’ve eaten and when I’ve had enough,
My body and my troubles will lose their burdensome weight;
I will age more gracefully, with fewer ills.

I repeat that whenever I sit down to eat, or when I feel the urge to eat between meals. I hope that it works for me as well as it did for King Prasenadi. I will let you know.